Contact
Book a strategy call Start Your Funding Scan
Skip to content

Funding for life sciences and health

In life sciences, many years often lie between the first idea and market introduction. During that period costs accrue for preclinical work, trials, approval and quality assurance with no revenue against them. Financing those phases purely through equity or investor rounds often dilutes more than necessary. Public funding in this sector is therefore rarely a bonus, but a fixed part of the financing strategy. This page covers which projects typically qualify and how funding can be planned across the development phases.

Heineken
UltiMaker
Coolblue
ABN AMRO
KPN
Vattenfall
PostNL
ProRail
NS
Jumbo
ANWB
Bynder
Universiteit Utrecht
Nedap
VDL
Gasunie
Fugro
Unit4
Zeeman
Basic-Fit

The developments shaping your roadmap

Digitalisation of care. Software as a medical device, telemedicine and data-driven diagnostics raise new regulatory questions.

Personalised medicine and biotechnology. Cell and gene therapy and companion diagnostics shift production towards more specific processes.

Energy efficiency & decarbonisation

From equipment replacement to process heat: programmes for lower energy use and CO₂ are currently especially well funded.

Automation & robotics

Investment in robotics, sensor technology and connected equipment that secures productivity without replacing people.

Digitalisation & Industry 4.0

From the digital twin to connected manufacturing: funding for modernising production IT.

The programmes behind it

  • Horizon Europe: for collaborative research and development, usually in multi-country consortia.
  • EUREKA Eurostars: for international R&D projects by smaller companies.
  • EIC Accelerator: for market-facing innovation with breakthrough potential, combining a grant with optional equity.

  • Forschungszulage: a tax-based instrument for eligible research and development expenditure, also relevant for companies without profit because an excess amount is paid out.
  • ZIM and kmu-innovativ: grant programmes for development work, the latter through thematic calls.
  • Dedicated clinical trial programmes: available depending on the trial phase.

  • WBSO: the base instrument for development work, reducing payroll tax for staff working on research and development. It works monthly and also applies without profit.
  • MIT R&D: for collaborative development projects between SMEs, opened regionally with differing windows and themes.

What to watch in this sector

In life sciences and health, applications rarely fail because the subject is not relevant. Risk arises mainly from how the development phase is classified, from regulation and from the structure of the partners.

01

Development or legal obligation?

Clinical evaluation, validation, quality management or documentation do not qualify automatically. What decides it is whether they are part of a genuine development risk, or whether they primarily fulfil a legal obligation for a product that is already defined. Only in the first case does the work count as research and development within the meaning of the WBSO.

02

Structuring collaborations cleanly

Many projects need hospitals, knowledge institutions, laboratories or CROs. These partners have to be technically necessary, contractually properly embedded and correctly allocated in the costs. Unclear roles or poorly delimited contracts quickly lead to queries or reductions.

03

Choosing the right development phase

A project can be too early for one scheme and too late for another. Between preclinical work, clinical validation, approval and market introduction in particular, the exact phase decides which instrument fits and what evidence is expected.

The pressures shaping your roadmap

Clinical evaluation, verification, validation, quality management and documentation are not formalities at the end of a project. They influence product design, trial planning, data quality and development decisions from the outset, and the effort involved has risen sharply.

Many years often pass between research, preclinical work, clinical testing, approval and market entry without reliable revenue. Financing is especially demanding in that phase because technical, clinical and regulatory risk come together.

Cell and gene therapies, biomarkers, companion diagnostics and personalised approaches shift development and production from standardised methods towards more specific, sometimes patient-proximate processes. That has substantial consequences for manufacture, scale-up, quality assurance and evidence.

How we work

We do not start with the application but with the question of which phase your projects sit in and which parts qualify. Our specialists know the Dutch schemes and the evaluation practice in this sector.

Numbers you can hold us to

95%

Success rate

Start your Funding Scan

Resources & Insights

I only need to supply the necessary documents and Ignite Group takes care of the rest. It gives us the freedom to focus on developing our technology and selling our products.

Eric Pellis Co-owner and Managing Director, INUTEQ

By goal rather than by industry

Already know what this is about? Switch to the matching objective.

Ready to secure your funding?

Find out what your business has been entitled to all along.

FAQs about funding advisory

View all FAQs

Yes, but not automatically. Clinical trials can qualify where they form part of a research, development or validation programme. Which route fits depends on the phase. Pure approval routine falls outside that. We determine what applies in your case in the first conversation.

Yes. Many instruments look at the project, the development phase and the financing capacity rather than at revenue. The WBSO, moreover, works through payroll tax rather than corporation tax, so it keeps working even without profit.

Partly. Work where it is open whether and how evidence can be produced may count as research and development. Pure mandatory documentation of a completed development stage does not. We make that delimitation before the application.

Through a funding roadmap. Completed, running and planned phases are each matched to the right instrument. The same work cannot be funded twice, but different phases can be funded differently.

Yes, usually for the better. Collaboration with hospitals and knowledge institutions strengthens many applications but brings its own requirements for roles and cost allocation.