Contact
Book a strategy call Start Your Funding Scan
Skip to content

Funding for chemicals and materials

In the Dutch chemicals and materials sector, the funding opportunity lies mainly in development work. New processes, new materials, circular routes and the substitution of critical substances call for research whose outcome is not established in advance. That is exactly the kind of work the Dutch schemes are designed for. Investments in plant also play a role, but they are rarely the starting point here. We therefore look first at the development part and only then at what remains possible around implementation. On this page you will learn which projects typically qualify and what matters in the application.

Heineken
UltiMaker
Coolblue
ABN AMRO
KPN
Vattenfall
PostNL
ProRail
NS
Jumbo
ANWB
Bynder
Universiteit Utrecht
Nedap
VDL
Gasunie
Fugro
Unit4
Zeeman
Basic-Fit

The developments shaping your investments

New materials with defined properties. Coatings, catalysts and battery materials are increasingly designed rather than discovered, and most projects stall between lab and plant.

Substituting critical substances. Regulation and raw material dependencies force the replacement of proven substances without losing product properties.

Energy efficiency & decarbonisation

From equipment replacement to process heat: programmes for lower energy use and CO₂ are currently especially well funded.

Automation & robotics

Investment in robotics, sensor technology and connected equipment that secures productivity without replacing people.

Digitalisation & Industry 4.0

From the digital twin to connected manufacturing: funding for modernising production IT.

The programmes behind it

  • Horizon Europe: for collaborative research and development, usually in multi-country consortia.
  • EUREKA Eurostars: for international R&D projects by smaller companies.
  • EU Innovation Fund: for technologies that substantially reduce greenhouse gas emissions, including demonstration and industrial scale-up.

  • Forschungszulage, ZIM and kmu-innovativ: for development work, where the technical outcome is not yet established.
  • EEW, GRW and regional programmes: for investment in plant, energy and resource efficiency.
  • Carbon contracts for difference: for lower-emission processes with permanently higher operating cost.

  • WBSO: the base instrument for development work, reducing payroll tax for staff working on research and development.
  • MIT R&D: for collaborative development projects between SMEs, opened regionally with differing windows and themes.
  • Topsector Energie schemes: a substantial share of Dutch funding for demonstration and pilot work in this field sits within the energy top sector rather than under chemicals.

What to watch in this sector

In chemicals and materials, risk often arises where development work, scale-up and investment flow into one another. Three points are particularly critical.

01

Process development and plant construction get mixed

A new material or process can contain R&D elements, piloting and investment in plant. These parts follow different logics. If the costs belonging to development, demonstration or construction are not separated cleanly, reductions or exclusion loom.

02

Scale-up risk underestimated

Many projects work in the lab but fail at pilot or demonstration scale on process stability, quality, energy demand, raw material variation or permitting. Applications therefore have to show which technical risks exist at scale and how the project reduces them.

03

Time recording in long-running development work

Because the centre of gravity here lies with development, hours are the largest cost item. Without traceable time recording and documentation of technical decisions, it later becomes difficult to prove who worked when on which part of the development. That matters more the longer a project runs.

What this means for your funding

Work on a process, material or method whose technical performance is not established at the outset. The second funds investment: building, converting or extending plant where a technology is already sufficiently defined. A third logic addresses the ongoing additional cost of lower-emission processes, where low-carbon production is more expensive to run than the existing method.

The balance between these logics differs by country. In Germany, investment and transformation instruments carry a large share of this sector. In the Netherlands the emphasis sits more strongly on research and development, with demonstration and pilot work often addressed through energy-sector programmes rather than chemicals-specific ones.

How we work

We do not start with the application but with the question of which parts of your work qualify and which logic they follow. Our specialists know the Dutch schemes and the evaluation practice in this sector.

Numbers you can hold us to

95%

Success rate

Start your Funding Scan

Resources & Insights

I only need to supply the necessary documents and Ignite Group takes care of the rest. It gives us the freedom to focus on developing our technology and selling our products.

Eric Pellis Co-owner and Managing Director, INUTEQ

By goal rather than by industry

Already know what this is about? Switch to the matching objective.

Ready to secure your funding?

Find out what your business has been entitled to all along.

FAQs about funding advisory

View all FAQs

Usually a plant that tests and proves a new or substantially improved process at relevant scale for the first time, without yet being fully regular series or routine production. The exact delimitation between R&D, demonstration and investment determines which scheme fits and is settled before the application.

Because schemes want to know whether a process or material also holds up outside the lab. What decides are scalability, process stability, raw material availability, quality, safety and profitability at relevant scale. We help make those open points visible and turn them into an eligible development or demonstration project.

Yes, many schemes allow multi-year projects, but with fixed durations, milestones and accountability obligations. In long development or demonstration projects it also has to be checked how costs, drawdowns and changes are handled across several financial years.

Yes, if the substitution creates technical uncertainty, for example because material properties, process stability, quality, safety or scalability first have to be tested. A mere change of supplier or the use of a known alternative through a proven method is generally not eligible development.