Skip to content

Funding for life sciences and health

In life sciences, many years lie between the first idea and market entry. During that time costs accrue for preclinical work, trials, approval and quality assurance with no revenue against them. Financing those phases purely through equity or investor rounds often dilutes more than necessary. Public funding in this sector is therefore rarely a bonus, but a fixed part of the financing strategy. This page covers which projects typically qualify and how funding can be planned across the development phases.

3D Spark
2R
Folienwelt
qlero
mm lab
Deutsche Firmenkredit Partner
ENTIAC
selecta one
DC Smarter
ZWF
Unternehmensgruppe Albert Weil
fierythings

The developments shaping your roadmap

Four developments drive projects in this sector, similar across Europe.

Regulatory requirements have become development work. Clinical evaluation, validation and documentation shape product design and development decisions from the outset.

Long cycles with heavy capital needs. Years pass between research, testing, approval and market entry without reliable revenue.

Digitalisation of care. Software as a medical device, telemedicine and data-driven diagnostics raise new technical and regulatory questions.

Personalised medicine and biotechnology. Cell and gene therapies and companion diagnostics shift production towards more specific processes.

Preclinical and early clinical development

Work whose outcome is not established at the outset, including the methods for testing efficacy and safety.

Medical device development

Design, verification and validation, insofar as technical questions remain open and not only known solutions are applied.

Software as a medical device and digital health

Algorithms, data platforms and applications whose reliability and regulatory conformity still have to be developed.

Biotechnological processes and manufacturing

Process development, scaling up manufacturing processes and work on reproducibility and yield.

Diagnostics and biomarkers

Development and validation of new diagnostic methods, including the data analysis required for them.

Investment in laboratory and production technology

Equipment required for development or later manufacturing, through instruments other than development funding.

The programmes behind it

For the German market, different instruments apply depending on the development phase. On the development side, these are the Forschungszulage, ZIM and thematic calls from kmu-innovativ. For clinical trials, dedicated programmes may apply depending on the phase.

At European level, Horizon Europe, EUREKA Eurostars and the EIC Accelerator are relevant where international collaboration, market-facing innovation or scale-up is the focus. Investment in laboratory and production technology is covered by different instruments than development work.

What to watch in this sector

In life sciences and health, applications rarely fail because the subject is not relevant. Risk usually arises from how the development phase is classified, from regulatory requirements and from the structure of the partners.

01

Development or regulatory obligation?

Clinical evaluation, validation, quality management or documentation do not qualify automatically. What decides it is whether they are part of a genuine development risk, or whether they primarily fulfil a regulatory obligation for a product that is already defined.

02

Structuring collaborations cleanly

Many projects need hospitals, research institutes, laboratories or CROs. These partners have to be technically necessary, contractually properly integrated and correctly allocated in the costs. Unclear roles or poorly delimited contracts quickly lead to queries or reductions.

03

Choosing the right development phase

A project can be too early for one programme and too late for another. Between preclinical work, clinical validation, approval and market launch in particular, the exact phase decides which funding instrument fits and what evidence is expected.

The pressures shaping your roadmap

Clinical evaluation, verification, validation, quality management and documentation are not formalities at the end of a project. They influence product design, trial planning, data quality and development decisions from the outset, and the effort involved has risen sharply.

Many years often pass between research, preclinical work, clinical testing, approval and market entry without reliable revenue. Financing is especially demanding in that phase because technical, clinical and regulatory risk come together.

Cell and gene therapies, biomarkers, companion diagnostics and personalised approaches shift development and production from standardised methods towards more specific, sometimes patient-proximate processes. That has substantial consequences for manufacture, scale-up, quality assurance and evidence.

How we work

We do not start with the application but with the question of which phase your projects sit in and which parts qualify. Our specialists know the programmes and the evaluation practice in this sector.

STEP 1

Review the projects.

We go through your roadmap and separate the parts that qualify from those that do not.

STEP 2

Match the programmes.

We map the qualifying work to the right instruments at regional, national and European level.

STEP 3

Build the applications.

We write against the actual evaluation criteria rather than the project description.

STEP 4

Protect what is awarded.

We keep documentation audit-ready throughout the funded period.

Numbers you can hold us to

0.5Billion

funding realized in 2025

Start your Funding Scan

Resources & Insights

Working with Ignite Group took a great deal of pressure off us. Thanks to […] their expertise, we always felt confident that our funding application was in the best hands.

Paula Hessing Senior Executive Assistant, MARKT-PILOT GmbH

By goal rather than by industry

Already know what this is about? Switch to the matching objective.

Ready to secure your funding?

Find out what your business has been entitled to all along.

FAQs about funding advisory

View all FAQs

Yes, but not across the board. Clinical trials can qualify where they form part of a research, development or validation project. Depending on the phase, dedicated clinical trial programmes, kmu-innovativ, the Forschungszulage or European instruments such as the EIC Accelerator come into consideration. Pure approval routine has to be distinguished from that.

Yes. Many funding instruments look at the project, the development phase and the financing capacity rather than at revenue. Tax-based instruments such as the Forschungszulage can also be relevant for companies without profit, because an amount exceeding the tax liability is paid out.

Partly. Work where it is open whether and how evidence can be produced may qualify. Pure mandatory documentation of a completed development stage does not. We make that delimitation before the application.

Through a funding roadmap. Completed, running and planned phases are each matched to the right instrument. The same work cannot be funded twice, but different phases certainly can be funded differently.

Yes, usually for the better. Collaboration with hospitals and research institutes strengthens many applications but brings its own requirements for roles and cost allocation.