State funding: funding options by federal state
Every federal state funds along its own priorities. What runs through a state programme in Baden-Württemberg may run through a different one in Sachsen, or may not be available there in the same form. For companies with several sites this means that the same project is treated differently depending on the location.
State programmes are often faster in procedure than federal or EU programmes and are frequently the more realistic option for smaller projects. They are regularly overlooked, however, because they are less visible and do not always appear to be centrally findable.
How the state, federal and EU levels interact
The three levels do not exclude one another; they cover different parts of a project. An investment can be subsidised through a state programme while the development share of the same project runs through a federal instrument. What matters is a clean delimitation of costs: the same costs cannot be funded twice. That is why we assess all three levels together before the first application is written, and set the order.
Funding options by federal state
When state funding is the better choice
Smaller projects.
Where federal programmes require minimum volumes, state programmes often come into play considerably earlier.
Faster procedures.
Shorter processing times and, frequently, rolling rather than fixed application windows.
Regional priorities.
The states fund in a targeted way along their own strategies, for instance digitalisation, the energy transition or particular sector clusters.
A complement to federal funds.
State funds and federal funds frequently cover different cost types within the same overall project, but never the same costs twice.