DE NL EN
Contact
Book a strategy call Start your Funding Scan
Skip to content

Funding for energy, environment and sustainability

Check investment funding Book a 20-min eligibility call

Energy prices, emissions targets, reporting duties, resource efficiency and new technologies change investment decisions faster than business models can carry them on market forces alone. That is exactly why public funding is directed into these areas. It exists to make investment, development and transformation possible where they are economically necessary but would otherwise happen too late or on too small a scale.

3D Spark
Heineken
UltiMaker
2R
Coolblue
ABN AMRO
Folienwelt
KPN
qlero
Vattenfall
PostNL
mm lab
ProRail
NS
Deutsche Firmenkredit Partner
Jumbo
ANWB
ENTIAC
Bynder
selecta one
Universiteit Utrecht
Nedap
DC Smarter
VDL
Gasunie
ZWF
Fugro
Unit4
Unternehmensgruppe Albert Weil
Zeeman
Basic-Fit
fierythings

The pressures shaping your projects

Four developments drive investment decisions in this sector, across Europe alike.

Decarbonisation at pace. Emissions targets and carbon pricing pull forward investment in renewables, electrification and hydrogen, faster than the economics justify.

Energy security and cost. Volatile markets and the drive for independence have made clean generation and efficiency strategic priorities.

Grid, storage and flexibility. Integrating variable renewables strains grids and creates demand for storage and smart grid technology.

Circularity, water and environment. Circular models, waste valorisation and water technology are moving into core investment.

Renewable generation and heat

Solar, wind, geothermal and renewable heat, and the engineering of deploying them in demanding conditions.

Storage and grid innovation

Batteries and other storage, smart grid technology and integration of variable renewables where the engineering is genuinely new.

Hydrogen and carbon capture

Production, transport and use of hydrogen, and capture and use or storage of carbon, where technical and commercial risk is high.

Energy and resource efficiency

Re-engineering processes, buildings and systems to cut energy, emissions and resource use.

Circular economy and waste valorisation

Recycling and turning residual streams into usable materials or energy.

The programmes behind it

  • EU Innovation Fund: for technologies that make a substantial contribution to cutting greenhouse gas emissions, from development through to market entry.
  • LIFE: for environmental and climate projects, including circular economy and climate adaptation.
  • EIC Accelerator: for highly innovative companies with breakthrough technology and international market potential.

  • EEW: federal funding for energy and resource efficiency in industry, aimed at investment in production.
  • BEG for non-residential buildings: for energy retrofitting of commercial buildings.
  • KfW: subsidised loans and, in some schemes, grants. Works through the cost of capital rather than the return.
  • Forschungszulage and ZIM: for the development side, where the technical outcome is not yet established.

  • EIA and MIA/Vamil: tax-based schemes for investment in energy-efficient or environmentally friendly assets. They are the main instruments in this field in the Netherlands and target defined categories of equipment.
  • WBSO: for the development side, reducing payroll tax for staff working on research and development.

What to watch in this sector

In energy and environmental projects, funding risk rarely comes from a lack of relevance. More often applications fail on timing, delimitation and evidence.

01

Starting the project too early

Investment funding generally has to be applied for before contracts are placed, equipment is ordered or construction work is commissioned. Looking for funding after the investment decision forfeits the claim under many programmes, even where the project would otherwise fit well.

02

Development, investment and operation get mixed

A decarbonisation project can contain development work, capital investment and ongoing additional cost. These follow different funding logics. If costs are not separated cleanly, reductions or exclusions follow.

03

Impact not robustly quantified

Energy and environmental programmes frequently assess concrete effects: CO2 reduction, energy savings, resource efficiency, circular content or environmental impact. These should be underpinned early with robust assumptions, baselines and a monitoring approach, so they remain traceable in the application and later in the reporting.

What this means for your funding

work on technologies, processes or systems whose technical performance is not established at the outset. The other funds investment or operation: building, converting or covering the ongoing additional cost of a technology that is already known.

The first step is therefore to break a project down cleanly: what is development work, what is investment, and where do ongoing additional costs arise? Only then can the right instrument be identified.

Emissions targets, carbon pricing and regulatory requirements pull forward investment in renewables, electrification, hydrogen and carbon capture, often faster than the economics alone would justify. A gap frequently opens between the change that is required and what pays back in the short term. That gap is where public funding applies.

Circular models, waste valorisation, water technology, resource efficiency and climate adaptation are moving from the margins into core investment. Sustainability targets become concrete development, infrastructure and investment projects.

How we work

We do not start with the application but with the question of which parts of your project qualify and which funding logic they follow. Our specialists know the programmes and the evaluation practice in this sector.

STEP 1

Break the project down.

We separate development work, investment and ongoing additional cost.

STEP 2

Match the programmes.

We map each part to instruments at regional, national and European level.

STEP 3

Build the application.

We write against the actual evaluation criteria and underpin the impact with robust assumptions.

STEP 4

Protect what is awarded.

We keep documentation audit-ready throughout the funded period.

Numbers you can hold us to

95%

Success rate

Start your Funding Scan

Resources & Insights

Browse all downloads
Case Study Manufacturing · WBSO · SME

TSD Tooling & Precision

Tools that are accurate to within a thousandth of a millimetre: that calls for research, development and expensive prototypes. With the WBSO (the Dutch R&D tax credit) and Ignite Group’s technical knowledge, TSD…

Read the case study
Whitepaper PDF · 11 pages · 2026

Turning Innovation into Predictable Cash Flow

How CFOs use public funding programmes as a strategic financial tool

Download the whitepaper
Case Study Footwear retail · SLIM · EIA · MIA · MDIEU · Large enterprise

Schuurman Schoenen

A family business with 650 employees, 49 stores and the conviction that the person behind the product is what counts. Together with Ignite Group, Schuurman Schoenen translated that vision into its own academy, more…

Read the case study

I only need to supply the necessary documents and Ignite Group takes care of the rest. It gives us the freedom to focus on developing our technology and selling our products.

Eric Pellis Co-owner and Managing Director, INUTEQ
View all case studies

By goal rather than by industry

Already know what this is about? Switch to the matching objective.

Ready to secure your funding?

Find out what your business has been entitled to all along.

Start your Funding Scan Book a 20-minute strategy call

FAQs about funding advisory

View all FAQs

Possibly, but through a different instrument. Deploying proven technology falls under investment or operating support rather than innovation funding.

As a rule before the binding investment decision and before any contract is placed. For investment funding, ordering equipment, signing a supply or service contract or starting construction often already counts as the start of the project. Checking for funding after that point can forfeit the claim. Eligibility should therefore be settled as soon as a project becomes concrete.

It can be possible, but it has to be checked carefully. In energy and environmental projects several funding logics often apply at once: development, investment, infrastructure or ongoing additional cost. The same costs may not be funded twice. In practice we first separate cost types and project phases, then decide which programmes can be combined and where boundaries are needed.

Frequently yes, in some cases through dedicated instruments. A feasibility study can be a sensible first step where technology, economics, permitting or scale are not yet settled. The same rule applies: check before commissioning whether the study itself qualifies and what conditions attach.