Whitepaper:
Closing the Transition Capex Gap
From Planning Question to Balance Sheet Reality

What you can expect from this white paper
In a board meeting in early 2026, a European industrial CFO was asked the same question for the third time this year: how is the company going to fund its transition capex? The honest answer explains why most peers stalled. Retained earnings can’t absorb it. Bank debt will not price it. Private equity will not wait for it.
The companies that are not stalled have learned to read a different funding architecture. For mid-sized industrial companies across Europe, in chemicals, steel, cement, building materials, and advanced manufacturing, the sustainability transition has stopped being a planning question and become an operational one. The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism is fully in effect. The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation begins enforcing recycled-content quotas in August 2026. Tier 1 customers are pushing Scope 3 requirements upstream faster than regulators are imposing them. The transition is happening on the company’s balance sheet, not in the next strategy cycle.
A credible transition programme typically requires EUR 20 to 200 million in capex over five to seven years. The European public funding architecture, three layers (European, national, regional) combined with four instrument types, has been designed to close the gap between what conventional finance can provide and what the transition actually costs. On a well-structured project, the stack contributes 30 to 50% of total eligible investment. Direct grants and tax credits alone cover EUR 29.3 million of a EUR 65 million reference project; add concessional debt from promotional banks and total public-leveraged capital reaches 88% of project cost.
Operators as different as Avantium in bio-based chemistry, Salzgitter in steel through its SALCOS programme, and Holcim in low-carbon cement have closed their capex stacks this way, by assembling instruments across layers rather than relying on any single source.
This paper sets out how that architecture works, illustrates the stacking logic on a concrete worked example in the Netherlands-Germany corridor, and gives each of the four functions of finance, technology, sustainability, and innovation a concrete 90-day starting point.
Four Converging Pressures
- How regulations like PPWR (enforcing recycled-content quotas from August 2026) and CBAM rewrite industrial competitiveness
- Why Scope 3 requirements from Tier 1 customers are forcing capex decisions faster than public regulations
- Why electrification projects must begin infrastructure and grid-connection planning 18 to 36 months before technology deployment
The Public Co-Financing Stack
- How to strategically combine European, national, and regional layers into a single, high-leverage funding stack
- Why a well-structured project stack can contribute 30% to 50% of your total eligible transition capex
- How operating grants and CCfDs (like SDE++ or Klimaschutzverträge) lock in your low-carbon unit economics for up to 15 years
The 90-Day Action Blueprint
- How to run a thorough TRL (Technology Readiness Level) audit to map your pipeline against eligible funding instruments
- How to design cross-functional consortia with value-chain partners to unlock high-volume European grant programs
- How to bridge the gap between your sustainability roadmaps and your strategic 5-year capital allocation plan
Download the white paper now
Download our white paper now. It shows you how to strategically leverage public co-financing to cover 30% to 50% of your transition capex, why conventional financing routes leave a critical structural funding gap, and how combining European, national, and regional instruments into a single stack converts marginal decarbonisation projects into highly attractive commercial investments.